Aranoff v. Bryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that petitioner had brought as-applied challenge because she “attack[ed] the canon as it [was] applied and interpreted by her supervisor”
• explaining that this Court would accept facts alleged in complaint, but not legal conclusions
• declining to accept as true conclusory statements in complaint with no factual basis
• declining to accept as true conclusory statements in complaint with no factual basis
• declining to accept as true conclusory statements in complaint with no factual basis
• distinguishing between factual allegations and questions of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).