Arango v. United States Department of the Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the APA’s arbitrary or capricious standard applies to the denial of in forma pauperis status in forfeiture proceedings
• holding that the bond requirement in the federal asset forfeiture statute was designed to promote “more efficient and less costly administrative forfeitures”
• explaining that the assertion of the privilege can’t be used as both a shield 6 against self-incrimination and a sword freeing the party from her own burden of proof
• noting that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against civil litigants
• \The Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against civil litigants....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).