Aranda v. Cardenas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony based on witness’s personal knowledge is admissible, even if that testimony is self-serving
• explaining that self-serving testimony is not barred, but rather a “matter of credibility for the fact- finder”
• explaining that a witness’s statements based upon personal knowledge and made in court are not hearsay
• noting self-serving testimony is not barred, but rather, becomes “a matter of credibility for the fact-finder to determine”
• reviewing the grant of summary judgment de novo after trial court had also denied a motion for reconsideration of the summary judgment
• noting self-serving testimony 7 PHILLIPS v. CABRERA, et al. Decision of the Court is not conclusive, but rather, becomes “a matter of credibility for the fact- finder to determine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).