ARAMARK UNIFORM AND APPAREL v. Easton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the cause of action created by section 376.313(3) is one of strict liability
• setting forth the principle that the “legislative use of different terms in different portions of the same statute is strong evidence that different meanings were intended” (quoting State v. Bradford, 787 So. 2d 811, 819 (Fla. 2001))
• \A statute creates a new cause of action if it provides a remedy unavailable under the common law.\
• “The absence of a causation requirement in the statute cannot be viewed as a legislative oversight,”
• first citing State v. Webb, 398 So. 2d 820, 825 (Fla. 1981); and then quoting Webb, 398 So. 2d at 825
• “It is axiomatic that whether a private right of action exists for a violation of a statute is a matter of legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).