Arakawa v. Japan Network Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that arbitration agreement was not invalid merely because employee signed it to keep her job, absent other allegations of unfairness, oppression or unconscionability
• “At this point in the litigation it is not clear how large the fees of the arbitration will be or whether plaintiff will be required to pay any portion of it....”
• \At this point in the litigation it is not clear how large the fees of the arbitration will be or whether plaintiff will be required to pay any portion of it....\
• “[T]he parties’ agreement to arbitrate is evidenced by the Employee Handbook and the Acknowledgment signed by plaintiff.”
• “[T]he parties’ agreement to arbitrate is evidenced by the Employee Handbook and the Acknowledgment signed by plaintiff.”
• “All of [the plaintiff’s] claims—sexual harassment, wrongful discharge and discrimination—arise out of or relate to her employment and are therefore claims that are subject to binding arbitration pursuant to the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).