Skip to main content

Araiza v. State

Citations

  • 929 S.W.2d 552
  • 1996 WL 482974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a mere reference to a document does not invoke the rule of optional -7- 04-10-00387-CR completeness
  • explaining that a mere reference to a document does not invoke the rule of optional completeness
  • “The issue is whether the picture ‘implies a police record.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: López, Stone, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.