Aragon v. Wilkinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that pleading defendant had not breached plea agreement by insisting on jury trial on sentencing factors and that defendant had waived right to jury trial “for the guilt phase of the proceedings,” not such right as to sentencing factors
• finding that pleading defendant had not breached plea agreement by insisting on jury trial on sentencing factors and that defendant had waived right to jury trial “for the guilt phase of the proceedings,” not such right as to sentencing factors
• reversing grant of state’s motion to withdraw after change in sentencing law because defendant did not actually breach any term of the plea agreement
• reversing grant of state’s motion to withdraw after change in sentencing law because defendant did not actually breach any term of the plea agreement
• accepting special action jurisdiction based on conclusion that constitutional issues relating to Blakely are of first impression and statewide importance
• “the court may utilize its inherent authority to convene a jury trial on the existence of facts that may support imposition of an aggravated sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).