Aragon v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “preliminary injunction [that] merely preserved the status quo pendente lite and did not materially alter the legal relationship of the parties” did not have sufficient judicial imprimatur to justify an EAJA award
• “Because the remand in this action was based upon Defendant’s voluntary consent to have OHA reconsider the size appeals, the ‘catalyst’ for the remand was Defendant’s consent, not a Court determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).