AR Moyer, Inc. v. Graham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing contractors' recovery against architect because extensive supervisory responsibilities created duty to prevent economic loss
• explaining the Moyer court analogized to products liability cases in order to “extend[] products liability law to economic losses” (alteration added)
• contractor may bring suit for negligence against architect although contractor not in privity with architect, supreme court applying products-liability tort principles to negligent provision of professional services
• “Because A.R. Moyer has been confined strictly to its facts, the duty of care there recognized does not extend to a subcontractor.”
• though this case was limited to its facts, the economic loss doctrine was thereafter limited to products liability cases; see Tiara Condo. Ass'n v. Marsh & McLennan Cos., 110 So.3d 399 (Fla. 2013)
• though this case was limited to its facts, the economic loss doctrine was thereafter limited to products liability cases; see Tiara Condo. Ass'n v. Marsh & McLennan Cos., 110 So.3d 399 (Fla. 2013)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).