Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/30/2000
Aquino v. Baldwin
Citations
- 169 Or. App. 464
- 12 P.3d 51
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1436
- 2000 WL 1279210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- We are not bound by factual findings that are “entirely unsup- ported by the trial court record”
- where “[n]o tactical advantage could have been gained” by the petitioner’s criminal trial counsel’s choice not to present certain evidence, trial counsel did not make a permissible tactical choice
- tactical choice reasonable where court can identify advantage that could be gained
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Muniz, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Abbott v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-05· cited 26×
- Cunningham v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-05· cited 25×
- Bogle v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-01-17· cited 15×
- Thompson v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31· cited 6×
- State v. PradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-02· cited 1×
- Grimes v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29
- Hernandez v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-02
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.