Aquila v. Aquila

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert’s “bare conclusory assertions ... which consisted primarily of speculative allegations with no independent factual basis, were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact and defeat [defendant’s] motion for summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).