Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc. v. Aerators Inc. And Frank Nocifora

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that expert testimony “may not correct errors or erase limitations or otherwise diverge from the description of the invention as contained in the patent documents”
• stating that expert testimony “may not correct errors or erase limitations or otherwise diverge from the description of the invention as contained in the patent documents”
• affirming the district court's rejection of the patentee's proposed claim construction that would broaden the claims beyond the scope of the claim limitations and specification description

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).