Skip to main content
· 10/5/2022

APX Operating Company, LLC v. HDI Global Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that when a candidate withdrew from an election after media reports of an incident, those media reports did not provide the petitioners, who wanted a new candidate’s name placed on the ballot, with a known right
  • providing that a statute should be interpreted to give effect to all of its provisions
  • finding that defendant’s interpretation would lead to “an absurd result” because it would require withdrawn candidates for certain offices to remain on ballot while allowing replacements for others
  • “[I]t is logical to assume that county election officials who are required to prepare ballots subject to the Secretary’s rules would turn to the Secretary of State for guidance_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz C.J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.