April Olivarez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a named plaintiff need only “file [a complaint] on behalf of herself and ‘other similarly situated employ- ees;” to become a proper plaintiff
• holding that opt-in plaintiffs remain party plaintiffs “until the district court determines they are not similarly situated and dismissed them”
• explaining that an appeal from a final judg- ment brings up all prior non-final rulings that produced the judg- ment
• explaining that an appeal from a final judgment brings up all prior non-final rulings that produced the judgment
• explaining that an appeal from the final judgment brings up for review all preceding non-final or- ders that produced the judgment
• explaining that a dismissal with prejudice is proper only after find- ings (1) of willfulness or a clear record of delay and (2) that lesser sanctions are inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).