Skip to main content
· 2/15/2005

Appling v. Appling

Citations

  • 156 S.W.3d 454
  • 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 508
  • 2004 WL 3186195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in entering a separate judgment in lieu of including college expenses in its Form 14 calculation.
  • an error in classifying property is prejudicial where it “materially affect[s] the merits of the action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William H. Crandall, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.