· 1/17/2024
Applied Building Sciences v. SC Dept of Commerce
Syllabus
This Court certified this case pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm the circuit court and hold the $50,000 statutory limit on reimbursement of reestablishment expenses in condemnation proceedings set forth in S.C. Code Ann. section 28-11-30(4) (2007 & Supp. 2023) is constitutional.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- even where overbroad warrant is combined with overbroad search for documents, equitable application of exclusionary rule does not require suppression or return of all evidence seized
- informant’s tip disclosed to Internal Revenue agents that dentist kept yellow sheets and green cards listing additional income; warrant authorizing seizure of many other types of records invalid
- where “the government knew exactly what it needed and wanted” in search for particular type of record, a warrant seeking all types of records is prohibited
- IRS agents knew specifically which records they sought, yet obtained general warrant to search
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.