E.D. Pennsylvania· 12/4/1990
Applications Research Corp. v. Naval Air Development Center
Citations
- 752 F. Supp. 660
- 1990 WL 199893
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a disappointed bidder has standing to challenge the government for disregarding the terms of its solicitation to award another bidder the contract
- APA action by disappointed bidder for government contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGLYNN
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Greenberg v. TomlinE.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-03-11· cited 33×
- Buffalo Central Terminal v. United StatesW.D. New York· 1995-05-10· cited 8×
- O'BRIEN v. City of PhiladelphiaE.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-11-22· cited 8×
- Action Service Corp. v. GarrettD. Puerto Rico· 1992-04-03· cited 7×
- United States v. Richlyn Laboratories, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-05-25· cited 6×
- Clark v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-07-26· cited 3×
- Eimers v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-03-05· cited 1×
- DeFiore v. VignolaE.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-11-08· cited 1×
- Alliant Techsystems, Inc. v. United States Department of the NavyE.D. Virginia· 1993-11-19
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 7,564×
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 5,583×
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court· 1977-02-23· cited 3,951×
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-02-24· cited 2,871×
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court· 1973-03-26· cited 2,333×
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 1,823×
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1971-10-14· cited 538×
- William T. Turner v. Schering-Plough CorporationThird Circuit· 1990-04-23· cited 359×
- J.F. Feeser, Inc. v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.Third Circuit· 1990-08-02· cited 324×
- Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc.Third Circuit· 1990-07-24· cited 273×
- Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. Securities and Exchange CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1989-04-21· cited 158×
- Delta Data Systems Corporation v. William H. Webster, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and System Development Corporation, (Two Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1984-09-21· cited 154×
- Gull Airborne Instruments, Inc. v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense of the U.S.A.D.C. Circuit· 1982-11-30· cited 145×
- KINNETT DAIRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. C. FARROW, Etc., Et Al., Defendants-Appellants, Flav-O-Rich, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantFifth Circuit· 1978-09-29· cited 135×
- The First National Bank of Pennsylvania, Trustee v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyFirst Circuit· 1987-08-14· cited 124×
- John W. Merriam v. Robert L. Kunzig, Administrator, General Services AdministrationThird Circuit· 1973-04-27· cited 108×
- B.K. Instrument, Inc. v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1983-08-04· cited 99×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.