Skip to main content
· 4/30/1970

Application of Wilhelm Ahlert and Ernst Kruger

Citations

  • 424 F.2d 1088
  • 57 C.C.P.A. 1023

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that applicants be given “the opportunity to challenge the correctness of the assertion or the notoriety or repute of the cited reference”
  • “[A]ssertions of technical facts in areas of esoteric technology must always be supported by citation of some reference work” and “allegations concerning specific ‘knowledge’ 7 The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (“MPEP”
  • “These aspects of judicial notice are ... designed with the purpose in mind of fully utilizing the independent and specialized technical experience of the Patent Office examiners while balancing the applicant’s rights to fair notice and an opportunity to be heard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Almond, Baldwin, Lane, Rao

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.