Application of Walter Spormann and Joachim Heinke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “That which may be inherent is not necessarily known. Obviousness cannot be predicated on what is unknown.”
• “That which may be inherent is not necessarily known. Obviousness cannot be predicated on what is unknown.”
• “the inherency of an advantage and its obviousness are entirely different questions. That which may be inherent is not necessarily known. Obviousness cannot be predicated on what is unknown.”
• \the inherency of an advantage and its obviousness are entirely different questions. That which may be inherent is not necessarily known. Obviousness cannot be predicated on what is unknown.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).