· 8/11/1960
Application of Victor Mills
Citations
- 281 F.2d 218
- 47 C.C.P.A. 1185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- utility for the compounds of the prior art and the claims was identical, but there was no \legal presumption\ of obviousness for a compound of a homologous series from a disclosure in the prior art of a non-adjacent member of the series
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirkpatrick, Martin, Rich, Smith, William, Worley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.