Skip to main content
· 8/11/1960

Application of Victor Mills

Citations

  • 281 F.2d 218
  • 47 C.C.P.A. 1185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • utility for the compounds of the prior art and the claims was identical, but there was no \legal presumption\ of obviousness for a compound of a homologous series from a disclosure in the prior art of a non-adjacent member of the series

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirkpatrick, Martin, Rich, Smith, William, Worley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.