Skip to main content
· 7/6/1960

Application of Schenectady Varnish Company, Inc

Citations

  • 280 F.2d 169
  • 47 C.C.P.A. 1156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unnecessary to determine whether design is intrinsically distinctive when evidence is sufficient to show that the design, apart from the word, has become distinctive
  • design consisting of cloud and lightning flash registrable on showing of secondary meaning
  • registration of a design mark under section 2(f)
  • registration of a design mark under section 2(f)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worley, Rich, Martin, Smith, Kirkpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.