Skip to main content
· 4/29/1971

Application of Sabatino R. Orfeo and Kevin P. Murphy

Citations

  • 440 F.2d 439
  • 58 C.C.P.A. 1123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expected that azeotrope could be used in claimed refrigeration process, but unexpected savings in power requirement
  • applicants “have the right to have considered the Rule 132 affidavit which allegedly shows new and unexpected results”
  • applicants “have the right to have considered the Rule 132 affidavit which allegedly shows new and unexpected results”
  • method of use patentable based on unexpected superiority in known properties of known compounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Almond, Baldwin, Lane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.