Application of Ryohei Oda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reissue declaration, made by all four inventors, stated that errors were made while translating from corresponding Japanese applications
• “In a sense, anything inserted in a specification that was not there before is new to the specification but that does not necessarily mean it is prohibited as ‘new matter.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).