Skip to main content

Application of Maples

Citations

  • 563 S.W.2d 760
  • 1978 Mo. LEXIS 340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the record showed “little more than a thinly supported claim of a 'psychological need to know' ”
  • “[t]he primary concern of the state must be to protect and foster an effective scheme for adoption, thus serving the best interest of the child.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rendlen, Henley, Finch, Donnelly, Houser, Bardgett, Seiler, Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.