Application of Lewis H. Sarett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It should be clear that the patent could not legally contain a claim to Sarett's sole invention under existing law because it would not have been the invention of the joint patentees.\ (emphases in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).