· 4/29/1971
Application of Leo L. Hengehold
Citations
- 440 F.2d 1395
- 58 C.C.P.A. 1099
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Congress did not intend a restriction to be considered a rejection
- “actions of examiners in requiring restriction under § 121 [are] within the supervision of the Commissioner and beyond the pale of review by the board”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Almond, Baldwin, Iowa, Lane, McMANUS, Northern, Rich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.