Skip to main content
· 4/29/1971

Application of Leo L. Hengehold

Citations

  • 440 F.2d 1395
  • 58 C.C.P.A. 1099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Congress did not intend a restriction to be considered a rejection
  • “actions of examiners in requiring restriction under § 121 [are] within the supervision of the Commissioner and beyond the pale of review by the board”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Almond, Baldwin, Iowa, Lane, McMANUS, Northern, Rich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.