Skip to main content
· 10/10/1960

Application of John R. Willingham

Citations

  • 282 F.2d 353
  • 48 C.C.P.A. 727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no intent to surrender where the applicant canceled and replaced a claim without an intervening action by the examiner
  • “The reissue provisions ... are based on fundamental principles of equity and fairness and should be so applied to the facts in any given case that justice will be done both to the patentee and to the public.”
  • \The reissue provisions ... are based on fundamental principles of equity and fairness and should be so applied to the facts in any given case that justice will be done both to the patentee and to the public.\
  • cancellation of claim was “error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Rich, Smith, Worley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.