· 1/6/1966
Application of John E. Borah
Citations
- 354 F.2d 1009
- 53 C.C.P.A. 800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- crux of obviousness-type double patenting inquiry lies in comparison of claims
- \We have no prior art here.\
- “We have no prior art here.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Worley, Rich, Martin, Smith, Almond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.