Skip to main content
· 3/4/1965

Application of John C. Nygard

Citations

  • 341 F.2d 924
  • 52 C.C.P.A. 1032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • New arguments “should be made in the Patent Office where appellant has the opportunity to answer them as contemplated by the statute, 35 U.S.C. § 132, and the rules, Rule 104(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worley, Rich, Martin, Smith, Almond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.