Application of Hawaiian Electric Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing that an agency “may not have had sufficient experience with a particular problem to warrant rigidifying its tentative judgment into a hard and fast rule”
• noting that “the [Public Utilities Commission’s] rules provide a mechanism for paHies to participate in contested case proceedings” and the Public Utilities Commission “did not preclude anyone from becoming a party to the contested case proceeding” (citation omitted
• noting that “the [Public Utilities Commission’s] rules provide a mechanism for paHies to participate in contested case proceedings” and the Public Utilities Commission “did not preclude anyone from becoming a party to the contested case proceeding” (citation omitted)
• appeal from PUC order granting utility's application to commit funds for construction of high-voltage overhead transmission lines
• appeal from PUC order granting utility's application to commit funds for construction of high-voltage overhead transmission lines
• court rejects argument that particular matter should have been addressed by rule making, on the ground, among other things, that the appellants failed to petition for the adoption of such a rule as required by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).