Skip to main content
· 11/14/1962

Application of Gene O. Sinex

Citations

  • 309 F.2d 488
  • 50 C.C.P.A. 1004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statement of intended use in an apparatus claim failed to distinguish over the prior art apparatus
  • statement of intended use in an apparatus claim failed to distinguish over the prior art apparatus
  • “the expression ‘for reconcentrating liquid dehydrating agents’ is merely a statement of intended use and does not qualify or distinguish the structural apparatus claimed over the reference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worley, Rich, Smith, Jackson, Kirkpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.