Skip to main content
· 12/22/1960

Application of Fred N. Hill

Citations

  • 284 F.2d 955
  • 48 C.C.P.A. 765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming an obviousness rejection of a claim to a chemical process conducted at 150-250 degrees when the prior art disclosed the same reaction at 300 degrees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worley, Rich, Martin, Smith, Kirkpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.