Application of Duvernoy & Sons, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing registration on the Principal Register of “Consistently Superi- or” because distinctiveness under Section 2(f
• refusing registration on the principal register of “Consistently Superior” because distinctiveness under section 2(f
• refusing registration on the Principal Register of \Consistently Superior\ because distinctiveness under Section 2(f
• refusing registration on the principal register of “Consistently Superior” because distinctiveness under section 2(f) was not proved; the court also observed that the term is a laudatory statement of fact and is incapable of distinguishing the appellant’s goods
• extensive advertising of \Consistently Superior\ accompanying trade name inadequate to confer trademark status to laudatory statement not relied on to denote origin
• “[W]e think it is clear from the exhibits that Duvernoy & Sons, Inc., appellant’s trade name (generally shown in large, fanciful letters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).