Application of Assurecare of Vermont

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that agency did not create new criterion but, within its statutory authority, merely explained existing criterion where agency rejected CON based on applicant’s lack of demonstrated ability to operate statewide HMO
• holding that agency did not create new criterion but, within its statutory authority, merely explained existing criterion where agency rejected CON based on applicant's lack of demonstrated ability to operate statewide HMO
• statutory time period is not mandatory, but target date, unless provision specifies consequence for failure to meet deadline
• burden of proof is on applicant to provide evidence on permissive criteria
• burden of proof is on applicant to provide evidence on permissive criteria

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).