Application of Arne v. Larson, Leveret C. Russler and Waldemar J. Meldahl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming rejection because “the use of a one piece construction instead of the structure disclosed in [the prior art] would be merely a matter of obvious engineering choice”
• affirming rejec- tion because “the use of a one piece construction instead of the structure disclosed in [the prior art] would be merely a matter of obvious engineering choice”
• use of a one piece brake drum integrally with a clamping means was merely a matter of obvious engineering choice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).