Supreme Court of Vermont· 5/3/1960
Appliance Acceptance Co. v. Stevens
Citations
- 160 A.2d 888
- 121 Vt. 484
- 1960 Vt. LEXIS 148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that appellant has burden to demonstrate error in challenged rulings and thus must produce record that substantiates appellant’s position
- stating that appellant has burden to demonstrate error in challenged rulings and must, therefore, produce a record that substantiates appellant’s position
- “To omit to incorporate into the record on appeal the transcript of applicable testimony and proceedings without authorization is to forfeit review of questions requiring reference to the transcript.”
- appellant has burden to demonstrate error in challenged rulings below and must, therefore, produce a record that substantiates appellant’s position
- “To omit to incorporate into the record on appeal the transcript of applicable testimony and proceedings without authorization is to forfeit review of questions requiring reference to the transcript.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hulburd, Holden, Barney, Smith, Shangraw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re S.B.L.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-08-26· cited 133×
- Kopelman v. SchwagSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-11-02· cited 31×
- Lafko v. LafkoSupreme Court of Vermont· 1969-06-19· cited 25×
- Socony Mobil Oil Company v. NORTHERN OIL COMPANYSupreme Court of Vermont· 1966-12-06· cited 21×
- State v. JewellSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-08-19· cited 12×
- State v. GadreaultSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-07-26· cited 12×
- Murray v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1962-11-07· cited 10×
- Davis v. Kneeland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1963-12-03· cited 7×
- Shepard v. Commercial Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont· 1962-07-03· cited 6×
- State v. DolleySupreme Court of Vermont· 1964-12-01· cited 6×
- Casellini-Venable Corporation v. RogersSupreme Court of Vermont· 1963-06-07· cited 4×
- In Re SBLSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-08-26· cited 1×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Latchis v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1957-07-07· cited 29×
- Anton v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Vermont· 1952-10-07· cited 25×
- Blanchard v. KnightsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1958-11-05· cited 12×
- Canfield v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont· 1959-01-06· cited 9×
- Davis's Admx. v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont· 1909-01-16· cited 9×
- City Electrical Service & Equipment Co. v. Estey Organ Co.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1951-01-02· cited 8×
- J. O. Bilodeau & Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Vermont· 1956-10-02· cited 7×
- Stark v. CrowellSupreme Court of Vermont· 1953-01-06· cited 4×
- Reed v. Vt. Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1939-11-07· cited 4×
- Ricci v. BillingsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1957-01-02· cited 2×
- Appliance Acceptance Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont· 1958-01-07· cited 1×
Other cases named Appliance Acceptance Co. v. Stevens
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.