Skip to main content

Appliance Acceptance Co. v. Stevens

Citations

  • 160 A.2d 888
  • 121 Vt. 484
  • 1960 Vt. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellant has burden to demonstrate error in challenged rulings and thus must produce record that substantiates appellant’s position
  • stating that appellant has burden to demonstrate error in challenged rulings and must, therefore, produce a record that substantiates appellant’s position
  • “To omit to incorporate into the record on appeal the transcript of applicable testimony and proceedings without authorization is to forfeit review of questions requiring reference to the transcript.”
  • appellant has burden to demonstrate error in challenged rulings below and must, therefore, produce a record that substantiates appellant’s position
  • “To omit to incorporate into the record on appeal the transcript of applicable testimony and proceedings without authorization is to forfeit review of questions requiring reference to the transcript.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hulburd, Holden, Barney, Smith, Shangraw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Appliance Acceptance Co. v. Stevens

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.