Skip to main content
· 10/31/1995

Applewhite v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.

Citations

  • 67 F.3d 571
  • 33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 920
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30971
  • 1995 WL 606114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 21 gives the court “discretion to sever an action if it . . . might otherwise cause delay or prejudice”
  • holding that Rule 21 gives the court “discretion to sever an action if it . . . might otherwise cause delay or prejudice”
  • stating that a district court has discretion to sever an action to avoid delay and prejudice
  • noting that Rule 42(b) permits severance for trial for efficiency and to avoid prejudice
  • affirming denial of class certification when “plaintiffs’ brief fail[ed] to address the requirements of Rule 23(b)(3)”
  • “[T]he district court also has discretion to sever claims under Rule 42(b), in furtherance of convenience or economy, or to prevent prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Garwood, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.