Skip to main content
· 7/30/2008

Appleton v. Intergraph Corp.

Citations

  • 627 F. Supp. 2d 1342
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59694
  • 2008 WL 2967112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \It is not sufficient that the facts in the complaint be consistent with a meeting of the minds; the plaintiff must instead plead facts that go beyond this to suggest that there actually was an agreement.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hugh Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.