Applehans v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court correctly denied motion to confirm arbitration award when party’s application to modify or correct it was pending with arbitrator
• rejecting an argument that insurance policy limits were waived as an affirmative defense because of the potential existence of an agreement to not disclose those limits to the arbitrator
• court properly refused to confirm award when application was pending before arbitrator to modify or correct it
• modification of award to include contractual right to limit recovery to policy limits affects merits
• \under the canon of construction expressio unius est exclusio alterius-the inclusion of one thing implies the exclusion of another-we conclude that the inclusion of specific grounds for modification implies the exclusion of other grounds\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).