Applegate v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• certifying a WCPA claim because “[a] presumption of reliance is 14 15 appropriate . . . where Plaintiffs have primarily alleged omissions” (emphasis omitted)
• applied rebuttable presumption of reliance in consumer protection context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).