· 3/16/1992
Applebee v. Brawn (In Re Brawn)
Citations
- 138 B.R. 327
- 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 410
- 1992 WL 58965
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that federal courts generally accord a state court judgment the preclusive effect it would receive under the law of the state in which it was rendered
- noting that a response to debtor’s motion to avoid a judicial lien “manifested [creditor’s] intention to contest [the debtor’s] exemption claim and effectively communicated that intention to [the debtor] and the court well within Rule 4003(b)’s thirty day period.”
- bankruptcy court outlining Maine’s four-pronged preclusion analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.