Skip to main content
· 3/16/1992

Applebee v. Brawn (In Re Brawn)

Citations

  • 138 B.R. 327
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 410
  • 1992 WL 58965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that federal courts generally accord a state court judgment the preclusive effect it would receive under the law of the state in which it was rendered
  • noting that a response to debtor’s motion to avoid a judicial lien “manifested [creditor’s] intention to contest [the debtor’s] exemption claim and effectively communicated that intention to [the debtor] and the court well within Rule 4003(b)’s thirty day period.”
  • bankruptcy court outlining Maine’s four-pronged preclusion analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.