Skip to main content
· 2/28/1989

Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc.

Citations

  • 436 N.W.2d 121
  • 8 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 21
  • 1989 Minn. App. LEXIS 214
  • 1989 WL 14988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the district court found the term “Docksider II-V” was ambiguous
  • all noting that parol evidence rule is principle of substantive law, not rule of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.