Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 6/1/1971

APPLE v. Reichert

Citations

443 Pa. 289
278 A.2d 482
1971 Pa. LEXIS 914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining the WCA is “clearly phrased to protect all co-employes in all situations where negligent conduct of one employe may cause injury to a fellow employe, provided only that the injury in question is one that is compensable under the Act.”
explaining the WCA is “clearly phrased to protect all co-employes in all situations where negligent conduct of one employe may cause injury to a fellow employe, provided only that the injury in question is one that is compensable under the Act.”
evidence showed that parties were in the course of employment as well as in the same employ
Section 205 of Workmen’s Compensation Act protects all co-employees in all situations where negligent conduct of one employee may cause injury to a fellow employee, provided only that the injury in question is one that is compensable under the Act.
Section 205 of Workmen's Compensation Act protects all co-employees in all situations where negligent conduct of one employee may cause injury to a fellow employee, provided only that the injury in question is one that is compensable under the Act.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Barbieri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.