Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]onetary damages would not prevent 9 [defendant] from continuing to infringe [plaintiff’s] copyrights . . . in the future . . . ; indeed, 10 [defendant’s] actions throughout this litigation and statements at oral argument reveal a 11 dogged determination to continue . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-09-28· cited 112×
• Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-03-30· cited 9×
• Frerck v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-02-07· cited 2×
• Montana Silversmiths, Inc. v. Taylor Brands, LLC
  D. Montana· 2012-02-08· cited 2×