Apple Corps Ltd. v. International Collectors Society

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting \the literal application\ of 8.4(c) on the grounds that it renders Rule 4.1 \superfluous\
• rejecting “the literal application” of 8.4(c) on the grounds that it renders Rule 4.1 “superfluous”
• rejecting “the literal application” of 8.4(c) on the grounds that it renders Rule 4.1 “superfluous”
• lawyers in private practice may use “an undercover investigator to detect ongoing violations of the law * * *, especially where it would be difficult to discover the violations by other means”
• the New Jersey Rule of Professional Conduct that prohibits misrepresentations “does not apply to misrepresentations solely as to identity or purpose and solely for evidence-gathering purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).