Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “quantitatively insignificant infringement may be substantial if the material is qualitatively important to plaintiffs work”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• The Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd.
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-10-19· cited 263×
• Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-09-19· cited 177×
• Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc.
  N.D. California· 1995-11-21· cited 135×
• Harguindey Ferrer v. Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1999-04-07· cited 42×
• Newton v. Diamond
  C.D. California· 2002-05-21· cited 31×
• Marobie-FL, Inc. v. National Ass'n of Fire Equip. Distributors and Northwest Nexus, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 1997-11-13· cited 27×
• Cybermedia, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.
  N.D. California· 1998-09-04· cited 10×
• MiTek Holdings, Inc. v. Arce Engineering Co., Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 1994-10-31· cited 7×
• Harguindey Ferrer v. Universidad Interamericana
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1999-04-07