Skip to main content
· 3/11/2013

Appel v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 214 Cal. App. 4th 329
  • 153 Cal. Rptr. 3d 798
  • 2013 WL 870983
  • 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant was a discharger because it did nothing despite knowing that the storage system on its property had discharged petroleum, that the property was contaminated, and that cleanup was needed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zelon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.