Appel v. Hupfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “But the law is equally clear in Maryland that there can be no recovery in an action for deceit on the ground of negligent misrepresentation”
• “Representations of value are regarded as expressions of opinion which should put the person to whom they are made upon inquiry, and if he chooses to rely upon such statements and fails to make inquiry, he cannot maintain an action for deceit.”
• requiring reasonable reliance as an element of fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).