Appeal of Runner
Citations
- 15 A. 647
- 121 Pa. 649
- 1888 Pa. LEXIS 700
Syllabus
<p>1. Credits indorsed upon a bond, are not evidence of actual payment of the credits sufficient to repel the presumption of payment of the bond, without proof that they were made within twenty years and whilst it was against the interest of the obligee to make them: See Gregory v. Commonwealth, Porter v. Nelson, and Breneman’s Appeal, preceding.</p> <p>2. In the present case, in the distribution of a decedent’s estate, declarations by the decedent shortly before his death held to exhibit an unequivocal acknowledgment of the existence of a specialty indebtedness, sufficient to repel the presumption of payment after the lapse of twenty years.</p>
Judges: Clark, Gordon, Green, Paxson, Sterrett, Trunks, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sheafer v. WoodsideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-03-19· cited 23×
- Hart v. BucherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-10-11· cited 6×
- Geiger's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1900-07-26· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. MorseSusquehanna County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1926-09-07
- Reynolds v. KachulisMercer County Court of Common Pleas· 1958-06-05
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.