Appeal of Major
Citations
- 126 Pa. 109
- 17 A. 535
- 1889 Pa. LEXIS 843
Syllabus
<p>(a) J. M. executed a bond to his son G. B. M., in the sum of $3,000, • conditioned that if he, the said J. M. “shall well and truly leave by bequest of will unto the said G. B. M., the farm on which he dwells and owns, with certain stipulations to be put therein, so that the said G. B. M.’s interest therein shall exceed the amount of his heirship to the amount of $3,000, then this obligation to be null and void.”</p> <p>1. The proper construction of the bond was, that J. M. should devise .his farm to G. B. M., subject to certain stiimlations not specified, yet in sneli a way that G. B. M. should realize his full share as heir, and the sum of $3,000 besides.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \A referee should restrict remand proceedings to the purpose indicated by the Board's order.. . .\
- “A referee should restrict remand proceedings to the purpose indicated by the Board’s order. ...”
- a referee should restrict remand proceedings to the purpose indicated by the Board’s order; to allow the referee to do otherwise would result in unnecessary confusion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Green, Mitchell, Paxhon, Sterrett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.